O-200 and cowl

Engine Topics
Forum rules
A forum for Panther aircraft builders and Enthusiasts. Two simple rules: Play nice and use a real name
Sacpilot
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 7:46 pm
First Name: Christopher
Last Name: Braun
City or Town: Rocklin
State or Province: CA
Location: Rocklin, CA
Contact:

Re: O-200 and cowl

Post by Sacpilot »

Yeah, I was thinking Lycon high compression o-200 with 9:1 pistons/cylinders. As I have already built an o-200 for my Zenuth that just sold. Only about $2k to do it. Would kick the o-200 up to 110-115 hp as per Lycon. Could also put a c-85 crank in to increase torque further. Could run with a true 110-115 dyno without appreciable wear on engine or high rpms, and you get a solid small engine like corvair for those who like aviation engines. Not better then Corvair, just different, for the WW fans..... ;)

Paul, I do not care about LSA, and would do an o-320 in a heartbeat, but I thought gross was a hard number. Don't want to exceed gross or have to add rear ballast to offset for w and b. I am 240 lbs without belt and shoes, and I want to be able to carry more then 10 gallons of gas without exceeding the gross for aerobatics. Please clarify the o-320 comment
Christopher Braun
CFII - Owner Norcal Flight Center
EAA Lifetime #808722
Panther SN-052

User avatar
at7000ft
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 4:59 pm
First Name: RICK
Last Name: HOLLAND
City or Town: CASTLE ROCK
State or Province: Colorado
Location: Castle Rock, CO

Re: O-200 and cowl

Post by at7000ft »

psalter wrote:It is not that it is too heavy for the LSA wing, but too heavy if you want to fly it as an LSA. There would not be much useable load left with the 1115 gross weight to keep in the stall speed. If you want to fly it with a medical and standard EAB there is more of a margin.
Correct, but if the FAA removes the 3rd class medical requirement it won't matter.
Rick Holland
N6819Z

psalter
Posts: 146
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 6:50 pm
First Name: Paul
Last Name: Salter
State or Province:
Location: Green Cove Springs, Florida

Re: O-200 and cowl

Post by psalter »

It is not that it is too heavy for the LSA wing, but too heavy if you want to fly it as an LSA. There would not be much useable load left with the 1115 gross weight to keep in the stall speed. If you want to fly it with a medical and standard EAB there is more of a margin.
Paul Salter
Team Panther
Engineer and Builder

Sacpilot
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 7:46 pm
First Name: Christopher
Last Name: Braun
City or Town: Rocklin
State or Province: CA
Location: Rocklin, CA
Contact:

Re: O-200 and cowl

Post by Sacpilot »

My understanding was that the 0-320 was too heavy for the LSA wing. I assume you mean you are going o-320 with sport wing.
Christopher Braun
CFII - Owner Norcal Flight Center
EAA Lifetime #808722
Panther SN-052

Renegade007
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 10:04 pm
First Name: Doc
Last Name: Bailey
City or Town: Deland
State or Province: Florida

Re: O-200 and cowl

Post by Renegade007 »

I think as Dan weighted everything the AE verison with the Christian Eagle system is slightly heavier than the 208 pound std IO-233.

doc

Renegade007
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 10:04 pm
First Name: Doc
Last Name: Bailey
City or Town: Deland
State or Province: Florida

Re: O-200 and cowl

Post by Renegade007 »

Just remember there is a new Lycoming Engien IO -233 fuel injected engine as well as now Renegade has an AEIO -233 120 hp 208 lb engine we have now been using for the past two years with tremendous success and its only 30 hp less than the 320 but up to 75 pounds lighter.

doc Bailey

WE have an 0-235 Lycoming with 43 hours on it SMOH for sale complete firewall forward for only 12k right now.

User avatar
at7000ft
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 4:59 pm
First Name: RICK
Last Name: HOLLAND
City or Town: CASTLE ROCK
State or Province: Colorado
Location: Castle Rock, CO

Re: O-200 and cowl

Post by at7000ft »

Sacpilot wrote:Hi! Thanks. Any approx ideas on how much this bigger cowl will slow down plane vs corvair cowling? O-200 is already a bit underpowered vs Corvair
Exactly why I am skipping the O-200 and 235 and going for the 320 (and paying a little weight penalty). From everyone I have talked to the 320 is the least expensive of the three to buy used or rebuild (supply and demand). Also since I fly out of a 6800 ft. field I can use the hp.
Rick Holland
N6819Z

Sacpilot
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 7:46 pm
First Name: Christopher
Last Name: Braun
City or Town: Rocklin
State or Province: CA
Location: Rocklin, CA
Contact:

Re: O-200 and cowl

Post by Sacpilot »

Hi! Thanks. Any approx ideas on how much this bigger cowl will slow down plane vs corvair cowling? O-200 is already a bit underpowered vs Corvair
Christopher Braun
CFII - Owner Norcal Flight Center
EAA Lifetime #808722
Panther SN-052

av8shar
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 1:20 am
First Name: Andrew
Last Name: Shorter
City or Town: New Bern
State or Province: NC
Location: New Bern, NC

Re: O-200 and cowl

Post by av8shar »

Cristopher, check out this link for info on the universal cowl… https://flywithspa.com/panther-producti ... encowling/

There are also some other pictures of the new cowl sanded in primer (but not on the a/c), I think I saw the word voluptuous used! No doubt it will be nice with Dan doing the work.

Andy

Sacpilot
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 7:46 pm
First Name: Christopher
Last Name: Braun
City or Town: Rocklin
State or Province: CA
Location: Rocklin, CA
Contact:

O-200 and cowl

Post by Sacpilot »

Dan,

I have experience with the o-200 and like it as powrplant for Panther. Either basic or souped up. I started thinking about the lines. If the engine is 3-4 inches wider than the corvair, how does that line look with the fuselage? I assume wider cowl is necessary. Do you leave off the shaped parts on either side of prototype cowl?

Any way to see a rough drawing or mockup to see how the wider universal cowl looks on the Pan?
Christopher Braun
CFII - Owner Norcal Flight Center
EAA Lifetime #808722
Panther SN-052

Post Reply