Prop advice to Lyc O-235 L2C

Engine Topics
Forum rules
A forum for Panther aircraft builders and Enthusiasts. Two simple rules: Play nice and use a real name
User avatar
JimParker256
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:01 pm
First Name: Jim
Last Name: Parker
City or Town: Farmersville
State or Province: TX
Location: KTKI - McKinney National Airport, Texas

Re: Prop advice to Lyc O-235 L2C

Post by JimParker256 »

at7000ft wrote:Concerning a 3 blade prop on a Panther. Is it true that only advantage over a 2 blade is that it looks real cool?
Aviation Consumer did a feature article on this a few years ago, using several different airplanes and props. Their conclusion was that the 3-blade props generally provided slightly faster climb rates (roughly 5%), at the expense of a few (2-5) knots lost in cruise speed. The 3-blade props were definitely smoother (they measured vibration levels at various power settings), and almost all of the participants and observers thought the 3-blade props were substantially less noisy than the 2-blade. The 3-blade props also provided more 'braking effect' when power was pulled off. But overall, the 2-blade props were slightly more efficient in cruise, where we spend most of our time.

Interestingly enough, when they actually used a decibel meter to measure the prop noise (both on the ground and in "flyover" mode), the 3-blade props were actually louder than the 2-blade props. Apparently, the difference was the frequency of the noise changed so that it occurred in a range that is less "objectionable" to human ears.

But the "ultimate" quality that won the day for the 3-blade props in the Aviation Consumer review was the "cool factor"... Everyone agreed that the 3-blade props just looked better, and made the airplanes look fast just sitting on the ramp.

One other thing to consider if you're going to be flying a lot of aerobatics... The gyroscopic effects of a 3-blade prop (generally heavier than their 2-blade counterpart) will be greater, and will thus transmit more loads/stresses to the engine, engine mount, and airframe during aerobatic. Just food for thought, as I have no aerobatic flight experience and am not a load stress engineer.
Jim Parker
Rans S-6ES (Rotax 912ULS)
Panther / Cougar - someday?

User avatar
at7000ft
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 4:59 pm
First Name: RICK
Last Name: HOLLAND
City or Town: CASTLE ROCK
State or Province: Colorado
Location: Castle Rock, CO

Re: Prop advice to Lyc O-235 L2C

Post by at7000ft »

Concerning a 3 blade prop on a Panther. Is it true that only advantage over a 2 blade is that it looks real cool?
Rick Holland
N6819Z

muehlberg
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:58 pm
First Name: S. Eric
Last Name: Muehlberg
City or Town: Newcastle (OKC)
State or Province: Oklahoma
Location: Oklahoma City, OK

Re: Prop advice to Lyc O-235 L2C

Post by muehlberg »

Les,

Thank you for the information. I understand it is based on only 4 hours, but it helps me a lot. What Sean and you are indicating between 3000 and 3500 feet msl (understanding that the temps were likely different) is what I was hoping to achieve with my Panther. I'm sure both of you would have a true air speeds in the 160 mph range at 7,500 ft or so. Not bad for an O-235 burning around 6 gph. The fact you are flying without wheel pants makes your speed at of 133 knots (about 153 mph) at 2520 even more impressive to me. Thanks to both of you for posting you data. I look forward to hearing more as your test flight envelopes expands.

Thank you again,

Eric Muehlberg
S/N 11 Panther LS

LesBoatright
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2017 9:09 pm
First Name: Les
Last Name: Boatright
City or Town: Titusville
State or Province: FL

Re: Prop advice to Lyc O-235 L2C

Post by LesBoatright »

Hi Eric,

To be quite honest, I have less than 4 hrs of flight time on the plane at this point. So, I think any data I give you is purely qualitative. With my job, and with the weather we've had the last coupla weeks, I haven’t flown enough to do a full set of flight tests, or to repeat tests and verify consistency. And I've spent much of my flight time so far at the low speed end of things, checking engine cooling and learning about our Panther's handling and stall characteristics.

I do believe our Static and In-Flight RPM values are still running about 100-150 RPM lower than what Dan predicted. But I'm not ready to change props after only 4 hrs! I'm happy with the performance so far, and we were never looking for absolute speed anyway. That wasn't our main mission.

For Static ground runs, we see about 2150 to 2200 RPM.
Dan says we should see about 2300 Static RPM with this prop/engine combo.
In flight, Wide-Open at about 3,000 feet, I saw around 2520 RPM and about 133 KNOTS indicated.
But that's a single data point, it was a very brief run (maybe 1 minute), and we don't have wheel pants installed.
I’ve checked our RPM against a hand-held optical unit to verify the EFIS RPM reading is accurate. And it seems to be.

Just for the record, we have the Sensenich WC68PM-65 prop that Dan recommended for our engine.
(2-blade, Fixed-pitch, wood core with Carbon Fiber overwrap)
It’s lightweight, and is a beautifully made prop! It was also easy to install with the Saber extension.
Our Lycoming O-235-C2C is a low compression engine.
The book says it's rated at 108 hp at 2700 RPM continuous, and like yours, it's supposed to make 115 hp at 2800 RPM (but limited to 5 mins at 2800).

We still have a lot of Phase-1 testing to go, so we'll fly more and collect more data when we can.
Les

muehlberg
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:58 pm
First Name: S. Eric
Last Name: Muehlberg
City or Town: Newcastle (OKC)
State or Province: Oklahoma
Location: Oklahoma City, OK

Re: Prop advice to Lyc O-235 L2C

Post by muehlberg »

Les,

As I'm using basically the same engine as you (O-235 C1B, 115 hp @ 2800), I'm really interested to hear how the prop preformed once you got everything worked out. Both static and max (full throttle in flight) RPMs and what speeds/altitudes you were indicating compared to Sean and his 118 HP. I need to order my prop but really wanted to hear what some of you with the O-235 engines are seeing before I do. Thanks in advance for any information you can provide.

Eric Muehlberg
S/N 11 Panther LS

LesBoatright
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2017 9:09 pm
First Name: Les
Last Name: Boatright
City or Town: Titusville
State or Province: FL

Re: Prop advice to Lyc O-235 L2C

Post by LesBoatright »

Thanks Again Dan!
That sounds good, and we're putting together a set of specific troubleshooting steps this week, starting with the simple stuff first, like verifying the tach with the TruTach optical reader.

I did some more research and found these great EAA Hints for Homebuilder's clips on Carb maintenance and adjustment.
Since we have not touched the Carb on our used engine since we got it, it makes sense that it may be out of adjustment.

Checking the Carb Inlet Screen for debris or blockage should be an easy item to check off. (we have the smaller MA-3 on our O-235)
http://bcove.me/155hkxzj
http://bcove.me/ls8yrrkx

The rest of our fuel system is new, clean and has been flushed out thoroughly to verify good. That Carb screen is the last filter element, and has not been checked yet. So we will.

Carb Adjustment (To me, this seems to be a very KEY piece of information for us)
http://bcove.me/cwz0zl0w

I think our idle RPM is a bit too high at around 750-775, with the lever pulled back to the closed position. It really should be closer to 700. Likewise, based on the engine roughness I felt at the lower RPM, I think we may be set a bit too Lean when the Mixture lever is sitting at the Full Forward/Rich position. IF we are indeed lean-of-peak when the Mixture handle is Full Rich, then we're surely losing some of our RPM there. So that's another item we will check and adjust as needed.

Sorry if I'm hijacking Sean's thread on the Prop type & Size. Hopefully this information can be helpful to others who might read this.

For Education & Recreation right???

Les Boatright
Panther Co-Builder
SN 083

danweseman
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 9:18 pm
First Name: dan
Last Name: weseman
State or Province:

Re: Prop advice to Lyc O-235 L2C

Post by danweseman »

Les
That certainly seems substantially low RPM your engine and prop. In very general terms the different HP rating of the 0-235 series are mainly due the compression ratio and RPM rating of the engines. If you research the power curves Your 108 HP engine should make a similar power to a 115 hp at the same RPM. but its peak rpm and HP will both be higher.
#1. verify the tach.
#2. if the rpm dosent change when doing a mag check it may be a wiring or switch issue that is only allowing one mag to operate at a time. This could drop 50-75 rpm? Dont know how yours is wired etc ,or if this is even possible.
#3. Do compression check, check engine timing etc etc. could be alot of things .
Your engine should spin that prop inth low 2300 rpm "range".

Your engine shouldnt vary by 60 RPM in a 1 minute run. We typically see less than 20 RPM variation in a 1 minute full throttle static run?

We are here to help if we can
Dan Weseman
Designer
Builder
Test pilot
Panther 515XP

LesBoatright
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2017 9:09 pm
First Name: Les
Last Name: Boatright
City or Town: Titusville
State or Province: FL

Re: Prop advice to Lyc O-235 L2C

Post by LesBoatright »

Thanks Sean & Dan!
Very Helpful Information. And thanks for the quick reply.
I posted a much more detailed response, but apparently the forum times out, and I lost it all. I'll type faster and not so much this time.

At Wide Open Throttle, during a 1 minute run, we saw a high of about 2140 RPM, and a low of about 2080 RPM on the GRT Sport EX display. Our RPM input comes from the P-lead of each Mag, and we have a LH/RH selector switch so we can switch the input when one Mag is OFF during a Mag check.

Great suggestion about using an optical Tach. A Hangar neighbor suggested same, and loaned me his pocket TruTach RPM checker. We took the day off from the project today, so I have not had chance to re-do the run-up and independently verify our RPM readings, but I feel they are accurate since they are based on the impulses coming from the mags. We will check with the optical checker next time we run engine.

Per the book numbers, our O-235-C2C has slightly less HP than the -L2C series that Sean has, which may account for some of the RPM difference.

I think we may also need to read up on idle and mixture adjustments for the Carb. We have not changed that since we got engine. The engine idles at about 750 RPM, and feels a little rough to me. It doesn't shut off, but not as smooth as it is at say 1000-1200 RPM. We may be running a little lean at idle?

I'll look to see if I can find an EAA Hints for Homebuilders on Carb adjustments. I have the O-235 operator's manual and it has some guidance, but more detail would be nice.

Also, we did mag checks and Carb Heat check at 1700 RPM, and saw no discernible change in RPM regardless of 1 Mag or 2, and with Carb Heat ON or OFF. So there's some more investigation for us to do there. Maybe a Mag check at Wide Open to see if there's an RPM response.

Last, I did a brief taxi of maybe 300 yards total, out and back to the T-hangar. I liked the responsive ground steering as compared to the Citabria I've been flying recently. The brakes were good and firm, and seemed plenty adequate, but they were noisy and squeaked a good bit. I suspect that has more to do with them being brand new than anything else.
It was exciting to have our project move under it's own power for the first time!!

At the 6 month mark into our build, we're calling our build done less the testing, tweaking, calibrating, and paperwork.
Thanks again. Bob, Ed, & I appreciate any more insights you might have.
Les Boatright
Panther Co-Builder
SN 083

Seansull
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 8:08 pm
First Name: Sean
Last Name: Sullivan
City or Town: Fort Worth
State or Province: TX
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Contact:

Re: Prop advice to Lyc O-235 L2C

Post by Seansull »

Hi Les,

I am seeing about 2370-2400 rpm static with my 0-235 L2C (118 hp at 2800 rpm) and my WC68PM-65 prop that Dan set me up with.

I am seeing the following speeds straight and level. All of these numbers were preformed at 3500 msl at around 90 F.

RPM IAS
2800 159 mph
2700 150 mph
2600 145 mph
2550 142 mph

Full throttle climb 115 mph @ 2500 rpm climbing 1240 fpm
135 mph @ 2650 rpm climbing 900 fpm

Hope these numbers help you out!

Sean
Sean Sullivan
Based at KFWS
Fort Worth, TX 76110
Panther Builder SN048

Mine & Brian's Panther Builder Site:
https://www.facebook.com/NTXPantherSquadron

Our "Flight Club" page
https://www.facebook.com/FlightClubSpinks?ref=bookmarks

danweseman
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 9:18 pm
First Name: dan
Last Name: weseman
State or Province:

Re: Prop advice to Lyc O-235 L2C

Post by danweseman »

Les
You should be seeing "around" 2300 rpm static with the WC68PM-65. In your post you didn't say what you are getting?
Also the first question when dealing with props "Is your tach accurate" . WIth EIS sysetems its very common to have to play with the settings etc to get accurate RPM readings. We always use a hand held external optical "prop tach" verify the Tach readings early in the testing. I can bring one down with me If we get down to look over your plane.
Let us know the rpm you are seeing
Dan Weseman
Designer
Builder
Test pilot
Panther 515XP

Post Reply